1 / 12
IMMUNOLOGY · MOLECULAR BIOLOGY

T Cell Activation
& Immune Checkpoints

From Molecular Mechanisms to Cancer Immunotherapy

Based on Peer-Reviewed Literature 2013–2024
Key References Chen & Flies, Nat Rev Immunol 2013 · Frontiers Immunol 2024
TCR
PD-1
CTLA-4
CD28
MHC
01

Overview & Learning Objectives

🔬

T Cell Activation

Two-signal model, TCR signaling cascade, immunological synapse formation

Signal Transduction

Lck → ZAP-70 → LAT → PLC-γ1 → Ca²⁺/NFAT, PKCθ/NF-κB, RAS/ERK pathways

🛑

Immune Checkpoints

CTLA-4 and PD-1/PD-L1 as brakes on T cell activation — mechanisms and biology

💊

Clinical Translation

FDA-approved checkpoint inhibitors, clinical trial data, combination strategies

KEY CONCEPT The balance between co-stimulatory and co-inhibitory signals determines T cell fate: activation, anergy, or exhaustion
02

The Two-Signal Model of T Cell Activation

APC / Dendritic Cell
MHC-II
+ peptide
CD80/
CD86
Signal 1
Signal 2
Naïve T Cell
TCR/
CD3
CD28
✓ Signal 1 + Signal 2 → Full Activation
✗ Signal 1 alone → Anergy / Deletion
⚠ No Signal → No Response

Signal 1 — Antigen Recognition

TCR engages peptide-MHC complex on APC. CD4 or CD8 co-receptors stabilize interaction. Lck (associated with CD4/CD8) phosphorylates ITAMs on CD3ζ chain.

Chen & Flies, Nat Rev Immunol, 2013

Signal 2 — Co-stimulation

CD28 binds CD80/CD86 on APC. Recruits PI3K via YMNM motif and Lck/GRB2 via PYAP motif. Amplifies TCR signaling, induces IL-2 production, prevents anergy.

Frontiers Immunol, 2024 · PMC3786574

Signal 3 — Cytokine Context

Cytokines (IL-12, IL-4, TGF-β) from the APC direct T cell differentiation into Th1, Th2, Th17, or Treg lineages.

BSI Immunology Review, 2024
03

TCR Signaling Cascade

🔗
TCR–pMHC Engagement Kinetic segregation model; CD45 exclusion from synapse
Lck & Fyn Activation Src-family kinases phosphorylate ITAMs on CD3ζ (Y83, Y94, Y111, Y123, Y142, Y153)
🎯
ZAP-70 Recruitment & Activation SH2 domains bind phospho-ITAMs; Lck phosphorylates ZAP-70 at Y315, Y319, Y492, Y493
🔀
LAT Phosphorylation → Signalosome ZAP-70 phosphorylates LAT; recruits PLCγ1, Grb2-SOS, Gads-SLP-76
Ca²⁺/NFAT
PLCγ1 → IP3 → Ca²⁺ release → Calcineurin → NFAT dephosphorylation → Nuclear translocation
IL-2, IL-4 gene expression
PKCθ/NF-κB
DAG → PKCθ → CARMA1-BCL10-MALT1 → IKK → IκB degradation → NF-κB
Survival, proliferation genes
RAS/ERK
RASGRP1 → RAS-GTP → RAF → MEK → ERK1/2 → AP-1 (Fos/Jun)
Cytokine production, differentiation
04

The Immunological Synapse

cSMAC
TCR CD3 Lck ZAP-70 CTLA-4
pSMAC
LFA-1 ICAM-1 Talin
dSMAC
CD45 CD43

🎯 cSMAC (Central)

TCR microclusters concentrate here. Site of sustained signaling. CTLA-4 competes with CD28 in cSMAC, physically excluding CD28 to attenuate activation.

🔗 pSMAC (Peripheral)

Adhesion ring formed by LFA-1/ICAM-1 interactions. Stabilizes T cell–APC contact. Required for sustained signaling duration.

🚫 dSMAC (Distal)

CD45 phosphatase excluded from cSMAC — critical for maintaining Lck in active state. CD43 also segregated here.

⚡ CD28 Costimulation at Synapse

CD28 YMNM motif recruits PI3K; PYAP motif recruits Lck and GRB2. Enhances Lck dynamics and sustains ZAP-70 phosphorylation even with low-affinity antigens.

Frontiers Immunol 2024 (fimmu-15-1503018)
05

T Cell Differentiation & Fates

Naïve
CD4⁺ T Cell
Th1 IFN-γ, TNF-α IL-12 + T-bet
Intracellular pathogens, macrophage activation
Th2 IL-4, IL-5, IL-13 IL-4 + GATA3
Humoral immunity, allergy, parasites
Th17 IL-17A, IL-22 TGF-β + IL-6 + RORγt
Mucosal immunity, autoimmunity
Treg IL-10, TGF-β TGF-β + FoxP3
Immune suppression, self-tolerance
Exhausted PD-1⁺ TIM-3⁺ LAG-3⁺ Chronic antigen + checkpoints
Tumor microenvironment — target of ICIs
CLINICAL RELEVANCE Tumor-infiltrating T cells become exhausted via chronic PD-1/PD-L1 signaling — checkpoint blockade reverses this exhaustion program
06

CTLA-4: The First Immune Checkpoint

Mechanism of CTLA-4 Inhibition
APC
CD80/CD86 (B7)
CD28 ⟵ Activation
CTLA-4 ⟵ Outcompetes CD28 (20× higher affinity)
T Cell
CD28
CTLA-4
🔴 Recruits PP2A and SHP-2 phosphatases → dephosphorylates TCR signaling intermediates
🔴 Physically excludes CD28 from cSMAC → disrupts positive signaling
🔴 Trans-endocytosis of CD80/CD86 from APC surface → reduces ligand availability
🔴 Expressed on Tregs constitutively → suppresses effector T cells in tumor
Ipilimumab
Anti-CTLA-4 mAb
FDA Approved: 2011
Metastatic Melanoma (1st checkpoint inhibitor)
CheckMate 067: Nivolumab + Ipilimumab vs. Ipilimumab alone
5-yr OS: 52% (combo) vs. 26% (ipilimumab alone)
Grade 3-4 irAEs: ~31% with dual therapy
PMC12554671 · Nature 2024

CTLA-4 Biology

  • Upregulated 48–72h after T cell activation
  • Constitutively expressed on FoxP3⁺ Tregs
  • Homologous to CD28 (20–30% sequence identity)
  • Binds CD80/CD86 with 20× higher affinity than CD28
  • Nobel Prize 2018: James Allison (CTLA-4 blockade)
07

PD-1/PD-L1 Axis: Peripheral Tolerance & Tumor Escape

Tumor Cell
PD-L1
(CD274)
PD-L2
(CD273)
← IFN-γ induces PD-L1 upregulation
PD-1 ⟷ PD-L1
SHP-1/SHP-2 recruitment
↓ ZAP-70 phosphorylation
↓ PI3K/AKT signaling
↓ IL-2, IFN-γ production
Exhausted T Cell
PD-1
(CD279)
TIM-3
LAG-3
FeatureCTLA-4PD-1
ExpressionActivated T cells, TregsActivated T cells, B cells, NK cells
LocationLymph nodes (priming)Peripheral tissues, tumor
LigandsCD80, CD86PD-L1, PD-L2
MechanismCompetes with CD28, phosphatase recruitmentSHP-1/2 recruitment, TCR signal dampening
irAE profileColitis, hypophysitis, rashPneumonitis, thyroid dysfunction, arthralgia
Pembrolizumab Anti-PD-1 · FDA 2014 Keytruda · Merck
Nivolumab Anti-PD-1 · FDA 2014 Opdivo · BMS
Atezolizumab Anti-PD-L1 · FDA 2016 Tecentriq · Genentech
Durvalumab Anti-PD-L1 · FDA 2017 Imfinzi · AstraZeneca
PMC12554671 · Sci Archives 2024
08

Tumor Microenvironment & T Cell Exhaustion

TUMOR
↑ PD-L1 ↑ IDO ↑ TGF-β ↓ MHC-I
Exhausted CD8⁺ T
PD-1⁺ TIM-3⁺ LAG-3⁺ TOX⁺
↓ Cytotoxicity ↓ IL-2
Treg
FoxP3⁺ CTLA-4⁺ CD25⁺
Suppresses effector T cells
MDSCs
CD11b⁺ Gr-1⁺
Arginase, ROS, NO production
TAM (M2)
CD163⁺ IL-10⁺
Pro-tumor, anti-inflammatory

T Cell Exhaustion Progression

Effector
PD-1⁻ TIM-3⁻
High cytotoxicity
Early Exhausted
PD-1⁺ TIM-3⁻
Partial function
Late Exhausted
PD-1⁺ TIM-3⁺ LAG-3⁺
TOX⁺ TCF1⁻
Terminal
CD38⁺ CD101⁺
Irreversible
⬆ Anti-PD-1 can rescue early/intermediate exhausted T cells
09

Clinical Evidence: Checkpoint Inhibitors

CheckMate 067
Nivolumab + Ipilimumab
Advanced Melanoma
52%5-yr OS (combo)
26%5-yr OS (ipi alone)
NCT01844505 · NEJM 2019
CheckMate 142
Nivolumab + Ipilimumab
MSI-H/dMMR Colorectal Cancer
55%ORR
85%12-mo OS rate
71%12-mo PFS rate
NCT02060188 · Overman et al. 2018
CheckMate 8HW
Nivolumab + Ipilimumab
MSI-H/dMMR CRC (Phase 3)
79%12-mo PFS rate
72%24-mo PFS rate
NCT04008030 · André et al. 2024
NSCLC PD-L1+ Analysis
Anti-PD-1 Monotherapy
Advanced NSCLC (PD-L1 TPS ≥1%)
28.6%ORR
15.2 moMedian OS
7.4 moMedian PFS
J Hematol Oncol 2024
⚠ Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs)
~10% Grade 3-4 with PD-1 monotherapy
~31% Grade 3-4 with PD-1 + CTLA-4 combination
33% Any-grade irAEs in Black patients (vs 44% White) — VHA 2024
10

Next-Generation Checkpoints & Emerging Therapies

TIM-3
Ligands: Galectin-9, HMGB1, PtdSer, CEACAM1
Marks terminally exhausted T cells; co-expressed with PD-1
Sabatolimab (anti-TIM-3) — Phase 2 trials
LAG-3
Ligands: MHC-II, FGL1, LSECtin, Galectin-3
Inhibits CD4⁺ T cell activation; expressed on Tregs
Relatlimab + Nivolumab (RELATIVITY-047) — FDA 2022
TIGIT
Ligands: CD155 (PVR), CD112 (PVRL2)
Competes with CD226 (activating); suppresses NK and T cells
Tiragolumab + Atezolizumab — Phase 3 ongoing
VISTA
Ligands: VSIG-3, PSGL-1
Expressed on tumor-infiltrating myeloid cells; suppresses T cells
CA-170 (oral VISTA/PD-L1 inhibitor) — Phase 1
Bispecific Antibodies
QL1706: PD-1 × CTLA-4 · Cadonilimab: PD-1 × CTLA-4
Single molecule dual blockade; potentially reduced toxicity
Cadonilimab: FDA Breakthrough Designation 2024; APOC3 biomarker identified
CAR-T + Checkpoint
PD-1/TIGIT dual shRNA CAR-T cells
Intrinsic checkpoint resistance in engineered T cells
NCT02414269: iCasp9M28z + Pembrolizumab — Phase 1
11

Summary & Key Takeaways

T Cell Activation

1 Two-signal model: TCR (Signal 1) + CD28 (Signal 2) required for full activation; Signal 1 alone → anergy
2 Signaling cascade: Lck → ZAP-70 → LAT → three parallel pathways (Ca²⁺/NFAT, PKCθ/NF-κB, RAS/ERK)
3 Immunological synapse organizes signaling molecules; CD28 enhances Lck dynamics and ZAP-70 phosphorylation
4 T cell fate determined by cytokine milieu: Th1/Th2/Th17/Treg/Exhausted

Immune Checkpoints

5 CTLA-4 acts at lymph node priming stage; outcompetes CD28 for B7 ligands (20× higher affinity)
6 PD-1/PD-L1 axis operates in peripheral tissues/tumor; IFN-γ induces PD-L1 as adaptive resistance
7 Checkpoint inhibitors (ipilimumab, pembrolizumab, nivolumab) have transformed cancer treatment — Nobel Prize 2018
8 Next-gen: TIM-3, LAG-3, TIGIT, bispecific antibodies, CAR-T with intrinsic checkpoint resistance
"The immune system has the power to eliminate cancer — checkpoints are the brakes; immunotherapy releases them."
— James P. Allison, Nobel Laureate 2018
Key References: Chen & Flies, Nat Rev Immunol 13:227 (2013) · Frontiers Immunol 15:1503018 (2024) · PMC12554671 (2025) · J Hematol Oncol 2024 · Cancer Biol Med 2024 · CheckMate 067/142/8HW trials